4.6 Article

Body Composition, Symptoms, and Survival in Advanced Cancer Patients Referred to a Phase I Service

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029330

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Research Resources, a component of the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research [RR024148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Body weight and body composition are relevant to the outcomes of cancer and antineoplastic therapy. However, their role in Phase I clinical trial patients is unknown. Methods: We reviewed symptom burden, body composition, and survival in 104 patients with advanced cancer referred to a Phase I oncology service. Symptom burden was analyzed using the MD Anderson Symptom Assessment Inventory(MDASI); body composition was evaluated utilizing computerized tomography(CT) images. A body mass index (BMI)>= 25 kg/m(2) was considered overweight. Sarcopenia, severe muscle depletion, was assessed using CT-based criteria. Results: Most patients were overweight (n = 65, 63%); 53 patients were sarcopenic (51%), including 79% of patients with a BMI, 25 kg/m(2) and 34% of those with BMI >= 25 kg/m(2). Sarcopenic patients were older and less frequently African-American. Symptom burden did not differ among patients classified according to BMI and presence of sarcopenia. Median (95% confidence interval) survival (days) varied according to body composition: 215 (71-358) (BMI, 25 kg/m(2); sarcopenic), 271 (99-443) (BMI<25 kg/m(2); non-sarcopenic), 484 (286-681) (BMI >= 25 kg/m(2); sarcopenic); 501 d (309-693) (BMI >= 25 kg/m(2); non-sarcopenic). Higher muscle index and gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis predicted longer survival in multivariate analysis after controlling for age, gender, performance status, and fat index. Conclusions: Patients referred to a Phase I clinic had a high frequency of sarcopenia and a BMI >= 25 kg/m(2), independent of symptom burden. Body composition variables were predictive of clinically relevant survival differences, which is potentially important in developing Phase I studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据