期刊
PLOS ONE
卷 6, 期 11, 页码 -出版社
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027537
关键词
-
资金
- Arcadia and the United Kingdom Research Council [RES-240-25-006]
- Economic and Social Research Council
- Natural Environment Research Council
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Scottish Government
- European Commission [244090-STEP-CP-FP]
- Economic and Social Research Council [ES/H037055/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- ESRC [ES/H037055/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Qualitative and quantitative methods are being developed to measure the impacts of research on society, but they suffer from serious drawbacks associated with linking a piece of research to its subsequent impacts. We have developed a method to derive impact scores for individual research publications according to their contribution to answering questions of quantified importance to end users of research. To demonstrate the approach, here we evaluate the impacts of research into means of conserving wild bee populations in the UK. For published papers, there is a weak positive correlation between our impact score and the impact factor of the journal. The process identifies publications that provide high quality evidence relating to issues of strong concern. It can also be used to set future research agendas.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据