4.6 Article

A Validated Model of Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone from Conception to Menopause

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022024

关键词

-

资金

  1. United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H004092/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G1100357, G1002033] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/H004092/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G1002033, G1100357] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) is a product of growing ovarian follicles. The concentration of AMH in blood may also reflect the non-growing follicle (NGF) population, i.e. the ovarian reserve, and be of value in predicting reproductive lifespan. A full description of AMH production up to the menopause has not been previously reported. Methodology/Principal Findings: By searching the published literature for AMH concentrations in healthy pre-menopausal females, and using our own data (combined n=3,260) we have generated and robustly validated the first model of AMH concentration from conception to menopause. This model shows that 34% of the variation in AMH is due to age alone. We have shown that AMH peaks at age 24.5 years, followed by a decline to the menopause. We have also shown that there is a neonatal peak and a potential pre-pubertal peak. Our model allows us to generate normative data at all ages. Conclusions/Significance: These data highlight key inflection points in ovarian follicle dynamics. This first validated model of circulating AMH in healthy females describes a transition period in early adulthood, after which AMH reflects the progressive loss of the NGF pool. The existence of a neonatal increase in gonadal activity is confirmed for females. An improved understanding of the relationship between circulating AMH and age will lead to more accurate assessment of ovarian reserve for the individual woman.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据