4.6 Article

The Worker Honeybee Fat Body Proteome Is Extensively Remodeled Preceding a Major Life-History Transition

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024794

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alexander-von-Humboldt foundation
  2. Research Council of Norway [180504, 185306, 191699]
  3. National Institute on Aging [P01 AG22500]
  4. Pew Charitable Trust
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada [F09-05648]
  6. Michael Smith Foundation (MSF)
  7. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  8. British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund
  9. British Columbia Proteomics Network via the MSF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Honeybee workers are essentially sterile female helpers that make up the majority of individuals in a colony. Workers display a marked change in physiology when they transition from in-nest tasks to foraging. Recent technological advances have made it possible to unravel the metabolic modifications associated with this transition. Previous studies have revealed extensive remodeling of brain, thorax, and hypopharyngeal gland biochemistry. However, data on changes in the abdomen is scarce. To narrow this gap we investigated the proteomic composition of abdominal tissue in the days typically preceding the onset of foraging in honeybee workers. In order to get a broader representation of possible protein dynamics, we used workers of two genotypes with differences in the age at which they initiate foraging. This approach was combined with RNA interference-mediated downregulation of an insulin/insulin-like signaling component that is central to foraging behavior, the insulin receptor substrate (irs), and with measurements of glucose and lipid levels. Our data provide new insight into the molecular underpinnings of phenotypic plasticity in the honeybee, invoke parallels with vertebrate metabolism, and support an integrated and irs-dependent association of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism with the transition from in-nest tasks to foraging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据