4.6 Article

Recording Lifetime Behavior and Movement in an Invertebrate Model

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018151

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ellison Medical Foundation
  2. UC MEXUS
  3. National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health (NIA/NIH) [P01 AG022500-01, P01 AG08761-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Characterization of lifetime behavioral changes is essential for understanding aging and aging-related diseases. However, such studies are scarce partly due to the lack of efficient tools. Here we describe and provide proof of concept for a stereo vision system that classifies and sequentially recordsat an extremely fine scalesix different behaviors (resting, micro-movement, walking, flying, feeding and drinking) and the within-cage (3D) location of individualtephritidfruit flies by time-of-day throughout their lives. Using flies fed on two different diets, full sugar-yeast and sugar-only diets, we report for the first time their behavioral changes throughout their lives at a high resolution. We have found that the daily activity peaks at the age of 15-20 days and then gradually declines with age for flies on both diets. However, the overall daily activity is higher for flies on sugar-only diet than those on the full diet. Flies on sugar-only diet show a stronger diurnal localization pattern with higher preference to staying on the top of the cage during the period of light-off when compared to flies on the full diet. Clustering analyses of age-specific behavior patterns reveal three distinct young, middle-aged and old clusters for flies on each of the two diets. The middle-aged groups for flies on sugar-only diet consist of much younger age groups when compared to flies on full diet. This technology providesresearch opportunitiesfor using a behavioral informatics approach for understanding different ways in which behavior, movement, and aging in model organisms are mutually affecting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据