4.6 Article

Potential Effects of Nutrient Profiles on Nutrient Intakes in the Netherlands, Greece, Spain, USA, Israel, China and South-Africa

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014721

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [018.003.012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Nutrient profiling is defined as the science of categorising foods based on their nutrient composition. Choices Programme is a nutrient profile system with criteria that determine whether foods are eligible to carry a option stamp. The Daily Menu Method which has been developed to evaluate these criteria is described here. This simulates the change in calculated nutrient intakes which would be the result of consumers changing their diets in favour food products that comply with the criteria. Methods: Average intakes of energy, trans fatty acids (TFA), saturated fatty acids (SAFA), sodium, added sugar and were derived from dietary intake studies and food consumption surveys of 7 countries: The Netherlands, Greece, Spain, USA, Israel, China and South Africa. For each of the key nutrients, these average intakes were translated into three Daily Menus per country. Average intakes based on these three menus were compared with average intakes from Choices Daily Menus. To compose the Choices Menus, foods from the Typical Menus that did not comply with the criteria were replaced with foods that did comply and are available on the market. Results: Comparison of intakes from the Choices Menus with the survey data showed that calculated intakes of SAFA, TFA, sodium and added sugar were reduced. Fibre intakes were increased. The size of the effect differed per Conclusion: The Daily Menu Method is a useful means to predict the potential effects of nutrient profiles such as Choices criteria, on daily nutrient intakes. The method can be applied internationally and confirms that the criteria of Choices Programme are in line with the aim of the programme: to improve nutrient intakes in the direction of recommendations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据