4.6 Article

Cytokine Profiles in Asthma Families Depend on Age and Phenotype

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014299

关键词

-

资金

  1. BMBF [07ALE087]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG WI621/5-1, DFG FR1526/1]
  3. National Genome Network [01GS0122]
  4. HMGU (Helmholtz Center Munich, former GSF) [fA1/4r, FE 75051]
  5. EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Circulating cytokine patterns may be relevant for the diagnosis of asthma, for the discrimination of certain phenotypes, and prognostic factors for exacerbation of disease. Methodology/Principal Findings: In this study we investigated serum samples from 944 individuals of 218 asthma-affected families by a multiplex, microsphere based system detecting at high sensitivity eleven asthma associated mediators: eotaxin (CCL11), granulocyte macrophage stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon gamma (IFN gamma), interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 (p40), IL-13, IL-17 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha). Single cytokine levels were largely similar between asthmatic and healthy individuals when analysing asthma as single disease entity. Regulatory differences between parental and pediatric asthma were reflected by six of the eleven mediators analyzed (eotaxin, IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, TNF alpha). IL-12 (p40) and IL-5 were the best predictor for extrinsic asthma in children with an increased odds ratio of 2.85 and 1.96 per log pg/ml increase (IL-12 (p40): 1.2-6.8, p = 0.019, and IL-5: 1.2-2.5, p = 0.025). Frequent asthma attacks in children are associated with elevated IL-5 serum levels (p = 0.013). Cytokine patterns seem to be individually balanced in both, healthy and diseased adults and children, with various cytokines correlating among each other (IL-17 and IFN gamma (r(s) = 0.67), IL-4 and IL-5 (r(s) = 0.55), IFN gamma and GM-CSF (r(s) = 0.54)). Conclusion/Significance: Our data support mainly an age-but also an asthma phenotype-dependent systemic immune regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据