4.6 Article

IL-16 Promotes T. whipplei Replication by Inhibiting Phagosome Conversion and Modulating Macrophage Activation

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 5, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013561

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence National de la Recherche (ANR) [05-MIIM-043-01]
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The replication of Tropheryma whipplei (the agent of Whipple's disease) within human macrophages is associated with the expression of IL-16, a cytokine known for its chemotactic and inflammatory properties. In this study, we asked whether IL-16 acts on T. whipplei replication by interfering with the endocytic pathway. We observed that in macrophages, T. whipplei was located within late phagosomes that were unable to fuse with lysosomes; in monocytes, T. whipplei was eliminated in phagolysosomes. Moreover, adding IL-16 to monocytes induced bacterial replication and inhibited phagolysosome formation. On the other hand, blocking IL-16 activity, either with anti-IL-16 antibodies in human macrophages or by using murine IL-16(-/-) bone marrow-derived macrophages, inhibited T. whipplei replication and rescued phagolysosome biogenesis. Furthermore, we propose that IL-16-mediated interference with the endocytic pathway is likely related to macrophage activation. First, IFN gamma induced T. whipplei elimination and phagolysosome formation and inhibited IL-16 production by macrophages. Second, the full transcriptional response of murine macrophages to T. whipplei showed that T. whipplei specifically modulated the expression of 231 probes in IL-16(-/-) macrophages. Gene Ontology analysis revealed that 10 of 13 over-represented terms were linked to immune responses, including proinflammatory transcriptional factors of the NF-kappa B family. Our results demonstrated a previously unreported function for IL-16 in promoting bacterial replication through inhibited phagolysosome biogenesis and modulated macrophage activation program.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据