4.6 Article

Modulation of IL-17 and Foxp3 Expression in the Prevention of Autoimmune Arthritis in Mice

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010558

关键词

-

资金

  1. SUDOE [IMMUNONET-SOE1/1P1/E014]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [FCT/POCI/SAU-MMO/55974/2004]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BD/23631/2005, SFRH/BD/49093/2008, SFRH/BPD/22575/2005]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/49093/2008, SFRH/BD/23631/2005, SFRH/BPD/22575/2005] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic immune mediated disease associated with deregulation of many cell types. It has been reported that different T cell subsets have opposite effects in disease pathogenesis, in particular Th17 and Treg cells. Methodology and Findings: We investigated whether non-depleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies, which have been reported as pro-tolerogenic, can lead to protection from chronic autoimmune arthritis in SKG mice - a recently described animal model of RA - by influencing the Th17/Treg balance. We found that non-depleting anti-CD4 prevented the onset of chronic autoimmune arthritis in SKG mice. Moreover, treated mice were protected from the induction of arthritis up to 60 days following anti-CD4 treatment, while remaining able to mount CD4-dependent immune responses to unrelated antigens. The antibody treatment also prevented disease progression in arthritic mice, although without leading to remission. Protection from arthritis was associated with an increased ratio of Foxp3, and decreased IL-17 producing T cells in the synovia. In vitro assays under Th17-polarizing conditions showed CD4-blockade prevents Th17 polarization, while favoring Foxp3 induction. Conclusions: Non-depleting anti-CD4 can therefore induce long-term protection from chronic autoimmune arthritis in SKG mice through reciprocal changes in the frequency of Treg and Th17 cells in peripheral tissues, thus shifting the balance towards immune tolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据