4.5 Article

Mean platelet volume reproducibility and association with platelet activity and anti-platelet therapy

期刊

PLATELETS
卷 25, 期 3, 页码 188-192

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/09537104.2013.793794

关键词

Aspirin; mean platelet volume; platelet; aggregation

资金

  1. NIH/NHLBI [T32HL098129]
  2. American Heart Association [0775074N]
  3. Doris Duke Clinical Scientist [2010055]
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [T32HL098129] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some studies suggest that mean platelet volume (MPV) correlates with increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aim to assess reproducibility, need for standardized measurements, effect of aspirin, and association with other established markers of platelet activity. Following an overnight fast, 48 healthy volunteers had weekly assessment of platelet activity and were administered aspirin 81mg daily for 7 d between weeks 3 and 4. We investigated the influence of time between phlebotomy and MPV measurement (n = 10). Reproducibility was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). MPV measurements were reproducible (Week 1: 10.6 fL [9.9-11], Week 2: 10.6 fL [10.0-10.9], Week 3: 10.6 fL [9.8-11]). CV was <= 4% and ICC > 85 (p < 0.001) for each comparison, indicating excellent reproducibility. There was no effect of aspirin on MPV (10.6 fL [9.8-11] versus 10.5 fL [9.9-11]; p -0.81). MPV significantly increased as time between phlebotomy and MPV measurement increased (Spearman's rho = 0.94, p = 0.001). Increasing MPV tertiles was associated with collagen-and thrombin receptor-activated peptide-induced platelet aggregation but not with ADP-or arachidonic acid-induced or spontaneous platelet aggregation. In conclusion, when standardized, MPV is a reproducible marker of platelet size and not affected by low-dose aspirin. MPV is modestly associated with some, but not all, markers of platelet activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据