4.5 Article

Coagulation status in coronary artery disease patients with type II diabetes mellitus compared with non-diabetic coronary artery disease patients using the PFA-100 (R) and ROTEM (R)

期刊

PLATELETS
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 616-622

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/09537104.2010.504868

关键词

Platelet function; thrombelastography; diabetes mellitus; coronary artery disease; PFA-100 (R); ROTEM (R)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous investigations in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) revealed differences in thromboelastographic parameters indicating different states of coagulability. The aim of the present study was to investigate the coagulation status of patients with documented CAD and type II diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-diabetic patients with coronary artery disease with the PFA-100 (R) and the ROTEM (R). No differences were found in platelet function as measured with collagen/epinephrine (263.6 +/- 70.6 s vs. 254.6 +/- 65.3 s) and collagen/ADP cartridges (105.3 +/- 63.2 s vs. 90.6 +/- 47.3 s) in CAD patients with DM and CAD patients without DM. Measured with the EXTEM reagent of the ROTEM (R), mean maximum clot elasticity (MCE) in patients with CAD and DM (233.6 +/- 86.9) was significantly longer than in CAD patients without DM (186.7 +/- 54.5), (p = 0.03). A similar result was seen using the INTEM reagent; patients with CAD and DM (234.4 +/- 83.9) showed a higher value for MCE than CAD patients without DM (190.8 +/- 57.8) which was of borderline significance (p = 0.053). Moreover, a weak trend for higher maximum clot firmness (MCF) was seen in CAD patients with DM compared with CAD patients without DM with the EXTEM reagent (68.1 +/- 7.5 vs. 63.6 +/- 8.6, p = 0.08) and the INTEM reagent (68.4 +/- 7.2 vs. 64.1 +/- 8.2, p = 0.09). The ROTEM (R) analysis indicates increased coagulability in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus compared to non-diabetic CAD patients. Moreover, the ROTEM (R) device seems to be an appropriate and easy-to-use tool to describe the coagulation status in these patients groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据