4.6 Article

Use of Vascularized Free Fibular Head Grafts for Upper Limb Oncologic Reconstruction

期刊

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
卷 127, 期 3, 页码 1244-1253

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318205f34b

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Transfer of a vascularized fibular graft is the method of first choice for reconstruction of defects of long bones. In particular, the vascularized fibula head graft is preferred for patients with bone defects of the upper limb involving the distal radius or the proximal humerus. The aim of the present study was to analyze the operative results, complications, and postoperative function after vascularized fibula head graft transfer and the indications for this procedure. Methods: From 1998 through 2008, vascularized fibula head graft transfer was performed in eight patients to reconstruct bone defects following resection of tumors of the upper limb. The primary site of the tumor was the proximal humerus in four patients and the distal radius in four patients. The postoperative course of the transferred bone was examined, and functional results were evaluated. Results: All vascularized fibula head grafts were transferred successfully. During the follow-up period, absorption of the transferred fibula head was not observed. The mean overall functional rating of the reconstructed shoulder joint was 70 percent. The range of motion of the reconstructed wrist joint showed no specific patterns, and instability of the wrist joint was observed in only one case. Conclusions: The authors believe that the vascularized fibula head graft transfer is a safe and reliable method for reconstructing the upper limb, especially for patients with a defect of the distal radius or the proximal humerus. This procedure is also useful for pediatric patients, in whom bone growth is expected after transplantation, and for salvage procedures after reconstructive materials of an artificial joint have failed. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 127: 1244, 2011.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据