4.2 Article

Metabolism of the anthelmintic drug niclosamide by cytochrome P450 enzymes and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolite elucidation and main contributions from CYP1A2 and UGT1A1

期刊

XENOBIOTICA
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 1-13

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/00498254.2015.1047812

关键词

CYP; glucuronidation; hydroxylation; niclosamide; reaction phenotyping; UGT

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81373496]
  2. Program for Pearl River New Stars of Science and Technology in Guangzhou [2014059]
  3. Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China [20134401120014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. Niclosamide is an old anthelmintic drug that shows potential in fighting against cancers. Here, we characterized the metabolism of niclosamide by cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) using human liver microsomes (HLM) and expressed enzymes.2. NADPH-supplemented HLM (and liver microsomes from various animal species) generated one hydroxylated metabolite (M1) from niclosamide; and UDPGA-supplemented liver microsomes generated one mono-O-glucuronide (M2). The chemical structures of M1 (3-hydroxy niclosamide) and M2 (niclosamide-2-O-glucuronide) were determined through LC-MS/MS and/or NMR analyses.3. Reaction phenotyping revealed that CYP1A2 was the main enzyme responsible for M1 formation. The important role of CYP1A2 in niclosamide metabolism was further confirmed by activity correlation analyses as well as inhibition experiments using specific inhibitors.4. Although seven UGT enzymes were able to catalyze glucuronidation of niclosamide, UGT1A1 and 1A3 were the enzymes showed the highest metabolic activities. Activity correlation analyses demonstrated that UGT1A1 played a predominant role in hepatic glucuronidation of niclosamide, whereas the role of UGT1A3 was negligible.5. In conclusion, niclosamide was subjected to efficient metabolic reactions hydroxylation and glucuronidation, wherein CYP1A2 and UGT1A1 were the main contributing enzymes, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据