4.7 Article

Sequential double extension twinning in a magnesium alloy: Combined statistical and micromechanical analyses

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 333-343

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.029

关键词

Magnesium alloy; EBSD; Twinning; Micromechanics

资金

  1. French National Research Agency under the project MAGTWIN [ANR-12-BS09-0010-02]
  2. French State through the National Research Agency (ANR) [ANR-11-LABX-0008-01]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-12-BS09-0010] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A statistical analysis is conducted on sequential (10-12)-(10-12) double extension twinning in a Mg AZ31 alloy obtained after two mutually perpendicular successive compressions. Indeed, primary twins form during the first compression, which produce secondary twins during the second compression. Here, sequential double twinning is adopted to describe this twinning mechanism, which is different from classic double twinning obtained during monotonic loading. Double extension twins, no matter sequential or classic ones, can be classified into Groups I-IV according to their misorientations with respect to the parent grain. In the present study, the majority of the sequential double extension twins have relatively high Schmid factors (SFs) and a misorientation of <0,14,-14,1> 60 degrees with respect to the parent grain (Group III). However, the classical SF based analysis fails to explain why secondary twin variants in Group III are preferred over their nearest orientated neighbors in Group IV, since their SF differences are negligible. Therefore, a static double inclusion model is developed to analytically compute the elastic energy in a final configuration of sequential double twinning. The model well explains the predominance of secondary twins in Group III by a noticeable greater decrease of free energy after secondary twinning. (C) 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据