4.3 Article

Inter-ELM filaments and turbulent transport in the Mega-Amp Spherical Tokamak

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/51/3/035016

关键词

-

资金

  1. United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  2. European Communities
  3. EPSRC [EP/G003955/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G003955/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Results on edge turbulence in periods separating edge localised modes (ELMs), i.e. inter-ELM periods, in Mega-Amp Spherical Tokamak ( MAST) are presented. It is shown through combined measurements of fast camera images and reciprocating Langmuir probes that filamentary structures contribute to transport during these periods. Analysis of Da light emission reveals that inter-ELM filaments are the lowest amplitude fluctuations in the MAST scrape-off layer (SOL) relative to L-mode and ELM filaments. Physical properties such as size, density and mode numbers have also been characterized, along with measurements of the spatio-temporal evolution: inter-ELM filaments are found to rotate in the vicinity of the last closed flux surface and propagate radially outwards. Motion of these filaments is found to depend strongly on plasma density such that with increasing density, there is an enhancement of the radial transport manifested by an increased number of filaments which leave the edge and travel faster into the SOL. Camera images show that intermittent fluctuations in ion saturation current signals correspond to inter-ELM filaments passing the probe. Measured radial e-folding lengths indicate larger decay lengths at higher densities. Similar trends are also obtained in simulations of a filament propagating radially and losing particles on ion parallel loss timescales. Finally, a discussion is presented on how the radial velocity and I-sat measurements reported in this paper are used to test the velocity scalings predicted by different theories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据