4.5 Review

African Medicinal Plants with Antidiabetic Potentials: A Review

期刊

PLANTA MEDICA
卷 80, 期 5, 页码 354-377

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1360335

关键词

Africa; antidiabetic effects; diabetes mellitus; medicinal plants; North Africa; East Africa; West Africa; Central Africa; Southern Africa

资金

  1. Competitive Research Grant from the Research Office, University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), Durban
  2. Young Researchers from the National Research Foundation (NRF), Pretoria, South Africa
  3. Education Trust Fund desk office, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diabetes mellitus is one of the major health problems in Africa. The conventional oral synthetic antidiabetic drugs available to manage the disease are costly and not readily affordable to the majority of the affected population. Interestingly, the continent is endowed with a tremendous number of medicinal plants that have been explored for their folkloric treatment of diabetes mellitus. Scientific investigations have validated the antidiabetic potentials of a number of these medicinal plants but there is no repository with information on these scientifically investigated plants as a guide for future research. In this review article, all of the in vivo antidiabetic studies conducted between January 2000 and July 2013 on African plants are systematically compiled with a closer look at some relevant plants from the continents subregions. Plants of the Asteraceae and Lamiaceae families are the most investigated, and West Africa has the highest number of investigated plants. Although promising results were reported in many cases, unfortunately, only a few studies reported the partial characterization of bioactive principles and/or mechanisms of action. It is hoped that government agencies, pharmaceutical industries, and the scientific community will have a look at some of these plants for future research and, if possible, subsequent commercialization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据