4.5 Article

Sarcopenia as a predictor of complications in penile cancer patients undergoing inguinal lymph node dissection

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 33, 期 10, 页码 1585-1592

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1471-6

关键词

Sarcopenia; Complications; Penile cancer; Inguinal lymph node dissection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lymphadenectomy (LND) is part of the surgical management of penile cancer but causes significant perioperative morbidity. We determined whether sarcopenia, a novel marker of nutritional status, is a predictor of postoperative complications after LND. Seventy-nine patients underwent LND for penile cancer from 1999 to 2014, and 43 had available preoperative abdominal imaging. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calculated on axial computed tomography images at the third lumbar vertebrae, and an SMI of 55 cm(2)/m(2) was used to classify patients as sarcopenic versus not. This classification was then correlated with postoperative complications and survival. Median lumbar SMI was 54.7 cm(2)/m(2) with 22 (51.2 %) patients categorized as sarcopenic versus 21 (48.8 %) who were not. Twenty-seven postoperative complications occurred in 20 patients within 30 days, of which 11 (40.7 %) were major (Clavien score a parts per thousand yenIIIa) and 16 (59.3 %) were minor. The most common complications were wound dehiscence (25.9 %), wound infection (18.5 %), lymphocele (18.5 %), and flap necrosis (14.8 %). On univariate analysis, the presence of sarcopenia, nodal disease, and lymphovascular invasion were predictors of postoperative complications. On multivariate analysis, only sarcopenia was an independent predictor of 30-day complications [p = 0.038; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1-21.1]. Although sarcopenia was not statistically associated with worse overall survival (OS), there was a trend toward poorer outcomes in these patients. Sarcopenia can be a useful prognostic tool to predict the likelihood of postoperative complications after LND for penile cancer. Preoperative nutritional supplementation may help reduce complication rates in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据