4.7 Article

PtFLC homolog from trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) is regulated by alternative splicing and experiences seasonal fluctuation in expression level

期刊

PLANTA
卷 229, 期 4, 页码 847-859

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-008-0885-z

关键词

Alternative splicing; FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC); Flowering time; In situ hybridization; Precocious trifoliate orange; Vernalization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30370996, 30671434]
  2. 863 project of China [2007AA10Z188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In many plant species, exposure to a prolonged period of low temperature during the winter promotes flowering in the spring, a process termed vernalization. In Arabidopsis, the vernalization requirement of winter annual ecotypes is caused by a MADS-box gene FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), which is a repressor of flowering gene. Here, a MADS-box gene was isolated from an early flowering trifoliate orange mutant (precocious trifoliate orange, Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf) by the RACE method combined with a cDNA library. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that the MADS-box gene is more closely related to the homologs of the FLOWERING LOCUS C lineage than to any of the other MIKC-type MADS-box lineages known from Arabidopsis. The expression profile of the MADS-box gene by real-time PCR showed upregulation of PtFLC during the winter, followed by a decrease in the spring and summer. This kind of cycling is contrary to the pattern observed in Arabidopsis. In situ hybridization reveals that the MADS-box gene is predominately expressed in the vegetative and reproductive meristems. In addition, five alternatively spliced transcripts of the MADS-box gene were also isolated at juvenile and adult mutant developmental stages. Expression analysis of these transcripts at different developmental stages indicated involvement of alternative splicing during phase change. The information suggests a complicated regulation mechanism in seasonal response and flower formation in perennial woody plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据