4.1 Article

Phylogeny, karyotype evolution and taxonomy of Crocus series Verni (Iridaceae)

期刊

PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 301, 期 1, 页码 309-325

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-014-1074-0

关键词

Crocus; Karyotype evolution; Molecular systematics; Taxonomy

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [173030]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [BL462/7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The taxonomically complicated Crocus series Verni is characterized by high intra-and interspecific variability of karyotypes (2n = 8-23). With the aim to get more insights into complex karyotype evolution and to clarify the taxonomy of this group, we combined morphological (twelve characters), molecular (chloroplast DNA: trnL-trnF, ndhF; nuclear DNA: ITS, pCOSAt103) and karyological analyses. Samples of different populations of C. etruscus, C. ilvensis, C. kosaninii, C. tommasinianus, C. vernus sensu lato and C. longiflorus (series Longiflori) were analyzed. Quantitative karyotype parameters were calculated for all taxa involved based on the available literature. For the taxon traditionally known as C. vernus, the analyses suggest that it should be split in five species: C. heuffelianus, C. neapolitanus, C. neglectus sp. nov., C. siculus and C. vernus. The comparison of genome total haploid lengths suggests that in the evolution of the group polyploidization only played a role within the C. vernus species complex, where we also detected two hybridization events. In all other taxa, chromosome evolution is probably characterized by chromosome fusions and fissions, sometimes affecting the entire haploid chromosome set. Comparative cytogenetics of the group indicates that series Verni is subject to a peculiar type of unequal change in chromosome size, i.e., that not both chromosome arms gain or lose equally in DNA content. As a taxonomic consequence of our study, series Verni is newly circumscribed, now including the autumn-flowering C. longiflorus and excluding C. baytopiorum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据