4.1 Article

Genealogical analysis of subspecies divergence and spikelet-shape diversification in central Eurasian wild wheat Aegilops tauschii Coss.

期刊

PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 279, 期 1-4, 页码 233-244

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-009-0159-7

关键词

Aegilops tauschii Coss.; Morphological variation; Population structure; Phylogeography; Intraspecific variation; Wild wheat

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [17201045]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17201045] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genealogical and geographic structure of variation in spikelet morphology was analyzed for central Eurasian wild wheat Aegilops tauschii Coss. using a diverse array of 203 sample accessions that represented the entire species range. In this sample set, two subspecies were identified on the basis of sensu-stricto criteria: only the accessions having markedly moniliform spikes were assigned to Ae. tauschii Coss. subspecies strangulata (Eig) Tzvel., whereas those having mildly moniliform and cylindrical spikes to Ae. tauschii Coss. subspecies tauschii. In a graph of the first two axes from a principal component analysis based on nine spikelet traits, the plots of the two subspecies formed separate clusters, indicating that subspecies strangulata sens. str. is a practically usable taxon. Chloroplast-DNA-based genealogical analyses suggested that subspecies strangulata diverged from an ancestor that carried a specific chloroplast DNA type, whereas, after divergence, this subspecies became polyphyletic, likely through hybridization. Geographically, significant longitudinal and latitudinal clines were detected for spikelet size, with spikelets tending to be small in the eastern and southern regions. These results shed some light on the patterns of subspecies divergence and spikelet-shape diversification in the course of Ae. tauschii's long-distance dispersal from the Transcaucasus to China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据