4.6 Article

How to establish endoscopic submucosal dissection in Western countries

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 21, 期 40, 页码 11209-11220

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11209

关键词

Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Early cancer; Endoscopic submucosal dissection clinical tutoring; Endoscopic submucosal dissection training; Gastrointestinal neoplasias; Endoscopic submucosal dissection learning curve; Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques; Endoscopic submucosal dissection complications

资金

  1. Leonie-Wild Charitable Foundation, Heidelberg-Eppelheim

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been invented in Japan to provide resection for cure of early cancer in the gastrointestinal tract. Professional level of ESD requires excellent staging of early neoplasias with image enhanced endoscopy (IEE) to make correct indications for ESD, and high skills in endoscopic electrosurgical dissection. In Japan, endodiagnostic and endosurgical excellence spread through personal tutoring of skilled endoscopists by the inventors and experts in IEE and ESD. To translocate this expertise to other continents must overcome two fundamental obstacles: (1) inadequate expectations as to the complexity of IEE and ESD; and (2) lack of suitable lesions and master-mentors for ESD trainees. Leading endoscopic mucosal resection-proficient endoscopists must pioneer themselves through the long learning curve to proficient ESD experts. Major referral centers for ESD must arise in Western countries on comparable professional level as in Japan. In the second stage, the upcoming Western experts must commit themselves to teach skilled endoscopists from other referral centers, in order to spread ESD in Western countries. Respect for patients with early gastrointestinal cancer asks for best efforts to learn endoscopic categorization of early neoplasias and skills for ESD based on sustained cooperation with the masters in Japan. The strategy is discussed here.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据