4.7 Article

Arabidopsis poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase 1 is required for drought, osmotic and oxidative stress responses

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 180, 期 2, 页码 283-291

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.09.002

关键词

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation; Poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase; AtPARG1; Abiotic stress response

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [30771399]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB119005]
  3. National Key Project for Research on Transgenic Plant [2009ZX08001-017B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is a post-translational protein modification that plays important roles in many cellular processes in mammalian systems. Emerging evidence indicates that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is also involved in plant growth, development, and stress responses. In the present study, we used genetic mutant parg1-3 and transgenic PARG1-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants to examine the role of poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase1 (PARG1) in abiotic stress resistance. Osmotic (mannitol treatment) or oxidative [methyl viologen (MV) treatment] stress reduced germination rates of the parg1-3 seeds compared with wild type seeds. The parg1-3 plants showed reduced tolerance to drought (withholding water), osmotic, and oxidative stress, as well as increased levels of cell damage under osmotic and oxidative stress and reduced survival under drought stress when compared with the wild type plants. Stomata of the parg1-3 plants failed to close under drought stress conditions. The expression level of oxidative stress-related genes AtAox1 and AtApx2 in the parg1-3 plants was reduced after MV treatment. However, when PARG1 was overexpressed in the parg1-3 mutant and the wild type Col-0 background, similar phenotypical changes to wild type were noted in response to drought, osmotic, or oxidative stress. These results suggest a function for PARG1 in abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据