4.7 Article

Quantitative trait loci controlling plant architectural traits in cotton

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 177, 期 4, 页码 317-323

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.05.015

关键词

Cotton; Plant architecture; QTL mapping; Epistatic QTL

资金

  1. National High-tech Program [2004AA211172]
  2. National Science Foundation in China [30070483, 30270806]
  3. Chinese Ministry of Education [10418]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2005037736]
  5. Jiangsu High-tech Project [BG2002306]
  6. Shandong Province Science Foundation [Q2007D03]
  7. Shandong Elite Variety Engineering Program [LN2007-7]
  8. IAEA [12846]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cotton plant architecture is an important characteristic influencing the suitability of specific cotton varieties in cultivation, fiber yield and quality. However, complex multigenic relationships and substantial genotype-environment interaction underlie plant architecture, and will hinder the efficient improvement of these traits in conventional cotton breeding programs. An enhanced understanding of the molecular-genetic regulation of plant morphological developmental can aid in the modification of agronomically relevant traits. In this study, an interspecific Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense BC1 population was used to identify QTL associated with plant architectural traits. Twenty-six single QTL were identified for seven plant architecture traits. The phenotypic variation explained by an individual QTL ranged from 9.56% to 44.57%. In addition, 11 epistatic QTL for fruit branch angle (FBA), plant height (PH), main-stem leaf size (MLS), and fruiting branch internode length (FBI) explained 2.28-15.34% of the phenotypic variation in these traits. The majority of the interactions (60%) occurred between markers linked to QTL influencing the same traits. The QTL detected in this study are expected to be valuable in future breeding programs to develop cultivars exhibiting desirable cotton architecture. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据