4.7 Article

Cloning of the promoter region of β-xylosidase (FaXyl1) gene and effect of plant growth regulators on the expression of FaXyl1 in strawberry fruit

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 177, 期 1, 页码 49-56

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.03.015

关键词

beta-xylosidase; Cell wall; Plant growth regulators; Ripening; Softening; Strawberry

资金

  1. CONICET [PIP 5488]
  2. ANPCyT [PICT 09-14239, PICT 2006-1140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expression and activity of cell wall modifying enzymes involved in fruit softening may be regulated by hormones and/or other signal molecules. In strawberry, FaXyl1 encodes for a fruit-specific beta-xylosidase probably associated to hemicellulose degradation. In this work, we have isolated and analysed the promoter region of FaXyl1 gene. Analysis of the sequence revealed the presence of cis-acting elements associated with hormone, light and stress-related responses. Several treatments were done on fruit in order to prove the responsiveness of FaXyl1 to plant growth regulators related to the regulatory elements identified in the promoter region (abscisic acid, auxins and gibberellins) and others associated with the ripening process (ethylene and nitric oxide). The effect of each treatment on FaXyl1 expression, the corresponding protein levels and the beta-xylosidase activity was evaluated. ABA (abscisic acid) stimulated FaXyl1 expression and protein levels. In contrast, expression levels of FaXyl1 gene decreased after treatments with NAA (naphthalene acetic acid), GA(3) (gibberellic acid) and ethephon, an ethylene-generating compound. SNP (sodium nitroprusside), a NO donor, did not affect FaXyl1 mRNA and protein levels. The effect of 1-MCP (1-methylcyclopropene), an ethylene perception inhibitor, on FaXyl1 expression was consistent with the effect observed with ethephon. beta-xylosidase activity was down regulated by NAA, whereas GA3, ABA, ethephon, 1-MCP and SNP had no effect on it. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据