4.7 Article

Aluminum-tolerance QTL in Columbia/Kashmir inbred population of Arabidopsis thaliana is not associated with aluminum-responsive malate excretion

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 175, 期 4, 页码 533-538

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.06.001

关键词

aluminum tolerance; Arabidopsis thaliana; Col/Kas RILs; malate release; QTL analysis

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19380042, 18208008]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18208008, 19380042] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aluminum (At) tolerance is one of the most important target traits for improving crop production in acid soil. To understand the complex molecular mechanism of At tolerance, QTL analysis in Arabidopsis would be one useful approach. Using relative root length as the Al-tolerance index, both composite interval mapping and complete pair-wise searches were performed to identify major QTL and epistatic interacting loci pairs, in the Columbia (Col)/Kashmir (Kas) recombinant inbred population. At tolerance among ecotypes was highly correlated with Al-responsive malate release and a major QTL detected for the RI populations derived from Al-tolerant and -sensitive ecotypes was associated with this function. However, these traits of both Col and Kas were similar and no relationship was found between Al-tolerance and -responsive malate release among the Col/Kas recombinant inbred population. In this case, QTLs detected from Col/Kas population overlapped the chromosomal position of a previously identified major QTL that did not associate with Al-responsive malate release. Two out of five detected epistatic interacting loci pairs were also closely related to chromosomal positions of epistasis identified in previous studies. These chromosomal regions, which were identified as pyramided QTL and epistatic, contain important genes for At tolerance, but not associated with At-responsive malate release. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据