4.8 Article

Can the Cyanobacterial Carbon-Concentrating Mechanism Increase Photosynthesis in Crop Species? A Theoretical Analysis

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 164, 期 4, 页码 2247-2261

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.232611

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EF-1105584]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. Emerging Frontiers
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [1105511] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental elevation of [CO2] around C-3 crops in the field has been shown to increase yields by suppressing the Rubisco oxygenase reaction and, in turn, photorespiration. Bioengineering a cyanobacterial carbon-concentrating mechanism (CCM) into C-3 crop species provides a potential means of elevating [CO2] at Rubisco, thereby decreasing photorespiration and increasing photosynthetic efficiency and yield. The cyanobacterial CCM is an attractive alternative relative to other CCMs, because its features do not require anatomical changes to leaf tissue. However, the potential benefits of engineering the entire CCM into a C-3 leaf are unexamined. Here, a CO2 and HCO3- diffusion-reaction model is developed to examine how components of the cyanobacterial CCM affect leaf light-saturated CO2 uptake (A(sat)) and to determine whether a different Rubisco isoform would perform better in a leaf with a cyanobacterial CCM. The results show that the addition of carboxysomes without other CCM components substantially decreases A(sat) and that the best first step is the addition of HCO3- transporters, as a single HCO3- transporter increased modeled A(sat) by 9%. Addition of all major CCM components increased A(sat) from 24 to 38 mu mol m(-2) s(-1). Several Rubisco isoforms were compared in the model, and increasing ribulose bisphosphate regeneration rate will allow for further improvements by using a Rubisco isoform adapted to high [CO2]. Results from field studies that artificially raise [CO2] suggest that this 60% increase in A(sat) could result in a 36% to 60% increase in yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据