4.8 Article

Auxin and Strigolactone Signaling Are Required for Modulation of Arabidopsis Shoot Branching by Nitrogen Supply

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 166, 期 1, 页码 384-U549

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.242388

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [294514]
  2. Gatsby Foundation
  3. Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Burgess Studentship
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  7. Norsk Hydro
  8. European Research Council (ERC) [294514] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degree of shoot branching is strongly affected by environmental conditions, such as nutrient availability. Here we demonstrate that nitrate limitation reduces shoot branching in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) both by delaying axillary bud activation and by attenuating the basipetal sequence of bud activation that is triggered following floral transition. Ammonium supply has similar effects, suggesting that they are caused by plant nitrogen (N) status, rather than direct nitrate signaling. We identify increased auxin export from active shoot apices, resulting in increased auxin in the polar auxin transport stream of the main stem, as a likely cause for the suppression of basal branches. Consistent with this idea, in the auxin response mutant axr1 and the strigolactone biosynthesis mutant more axillary growth1, increased retention of basal branches on low N is associated with a failure to increase auxin in the main stem. The complex interactions between the hormones that regulate branching make it difficult to rule out other mechanisms of N action, such as up-regulation of strigolactone synthesis. However, the proposed increase in auxin export from active buds can also explain how reduced shoot branching is achieved without compromising root growth, leading to the characteristic shift in relative biomass allocation to the root when N is limiting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据