4.8 Article

The Mediator Complex Subunit PFT1 Interferes with COP1 and HY5 in the Regulation of Arabidopsis Light Signaling

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 160, 期 1, 页码 289-307

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.112.197319

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [KR2020/2-3]
  2. Ministry of Science, Research, and the Arts, Baden-Wurttemberg
  3. European Social Fund within the Schieben-Lange-Program
  4. Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies, School of Life Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants hypersensitive to far-red light were isolated under a light program of alternating red and far-red light pulses and were named eid (for empfindlicher im dunkelroten Licht). The dominant eid3 mutant carries a missense mutation in a conserved domain of PHYTOCHROME AND FLOWERING TIME1 (PFT1), an important component of the plant mediator coactivator complex, which links promoter-bound transcriptional regulators to RNA polymerase II complexes. Epistatic analyses were performed to obtain information about the coaction between the mutated PFT1(eid3) and positively and negatively acting components of light signaling cascades. The data presented here provide clear evidence that the mutation mainly enhances light sensitivity downstream of phytochrome A (phyA) and modulates phyB function. Our results demonstrate that the Mediator component cooperates with CONSTITUTIVE PHOTORMORPHOGENIC1 in the regulation of light responses and that the hypersensitive phenotype strictly depends on the presence of the ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL5 transcription factor, an important positive regulator of light-dependent gene expression. Expression profile analyses revealed that PFT1(eid3) alters the transcript accumulation of light-regulated genes even in darkness. Our data further indicate that PFT1 regulates the floral transition downstream of phyA. The PFT1 missense mutation seems to create a constitutively active transcription factor by mimicking an early step in light signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据