4.8 Article

Identification and Regulation of Plasma Membrane Sulfate Transporters in Chlamydomonas

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 153, 期 4, 页码 1653-1668

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.157875

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB0235878, MCB0824469]
  2. Marie Curie award [MOIF-CT-2006-40208-APOSD]
  3. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences [0824469] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlamydomonas (Chlamydomonas reinhardtii) exhibits several responses following exposure to sulfur (S)-deprivation conditions, including an increased efficiency of import and assimilation of the sulfate anion (SO42-). Aspects of SO42- transport during S-replete and S-depleted conditions were previously studied, although the transporters had not been functionally identified. We employed a reverse genetics approach to identify putative SO42- transporters, examine their regulation, establish their biogenesis and subcellular locations, and explore their functionality. Upon S starvation of wild-type Chlamydomonas cells, the accumulation of transcripts encoding the putative SO42- transporters SLT1 (for SAC1-like transporter 1), SLT2, and SULTR2 markedly increased, suggesting that these proteins function in high-affinity SO42- transport. The Chlamydomonas sac1 and snrk2.1 mutants (defective for acclimation to S deprivation) exhibited much less of an increase in the levels of SLT1, SLT2, and SULTR2 transcripts and their encoded proteins in response to S deprivation compared with wildtype cells. All three transporters were localized to the plasma membrane, and their rates of turnover were significantly impacted by S availability; the turnover of SLT1 and SLT2 was proteasome dependent, while that of SULTR2 was proteasome independent. Finally, mutants identified for each of the S-deprivation-responsive transporters were used to establish their critical role in the transport of SO42- into S-deprived cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据