4.8 Article

Identification and Application of a Rice Senescence-Associated Promoter

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 153, 期 3, 页码 1239-1249

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.110.157123

关键词

-

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program)
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. National Program on Research and Development of Transgenic Plants
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SAG39 is a rice (Oryza sativa) gene that encodes a cysteine protease. SAG39 shares 55% homology with the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) senescence-associated protein SAG12. The promoter for SAG39 (P-SAG39) was isolated, and SAG39 expression was determined to be relatively low in mature leaves, while not expressed in the endosperm. SAG39 mRNA levels increased as senescence progressed, with maximum accumulation of transcripts at late senescence stages. Gel retardation assays indicated that two cis-acting elements in P-SAG39, HBOXCONSENSUSPVCHS and WRKY71OS, responded to leaf senescence. To test if P-SAG39 could be useful for increasing rice yields by increasing cytokinin content and delaying senescence, homozygous transgenic plants were obtained by linking P-SAG39 to the ipt gene and introducing it into Zhonghua 11. The chlorophyll level of the flag leaf was used to monitor senescence, confirming the stay-green phenotype in P-SAG39:ipt transgenic rice versus wild-type plants. Changes in the cytokinin content led to early flowering and a greater number of emerged panicles 70 d after germination in the transgenic rice. Measurements of sugar and nitrogen contents in flag leaves demonstrated a transition in the source-sink relationship in transgenic plants triggered at the onset of leaf senescence, with the nitrogen content decreasing more slowly, while sugars were removed more rapidly than in wild-type plants. The importance of these changes to rice physiology, yield, and early maturation will be discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据