4.8 Article

Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis of Two Genes Encoding Rubisco Activase in Soybean

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 152, 期 3, 页码 1625-1637

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.148312

关键词

-

资金

  1. National High-Tech Research Program [2006AA10Z1C1, 2008AA10Z153]
  2. National Basic Research Program [2004CB117206, 2009CB118400]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation [30771362]
  4. Ministry of Education of China [B07030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rubisco activase (RCA) catalyzes the activation of Rubisco in vivo and plays a crucial role in photosynthesis. However, until now, little was known about the molecular genetics of RCA in soybean ( Glycine max), one of the most important legume crops. Here, we cloned and characterized two genes encoding the longer alpha-isoform and the shorter beta-isoform of soybean RCA (GmRCA alpha and GmRCA beta, respectively). The two corresponding cDNAs are divergent in both the translated and 3' untranslated regions. Analysis of genomic DNA sequences suggested that the corresponding mRNAs are transcripts of two different genes and not the products of a single alternatively splicing pre-mRNA. Two additional possible alpha-form RCA-encoding genes, GmRCA03 and GmRCA14, and one additional beta-form RCA-encoding gene, GmRCA11, were also isolated. To examine the function and modulation of RCA genes in soybean, we determined the expression levels of GmRCA alpha and GmRCA beta, Rubisco initial activity, photosynthetic rate, and seed yield in 184 soybean recombinant inbred lines. Correlation of gene expression levels with three other traits indicates that RCA genes could play an important role in regulating soybean photosynthetic capacity and seed yield. Expression quantitative trait loci mapping revealed four trans-expression quantitative trait loci for GmRCA alpha and GmRCA beta. These results could provide a new approach for the modulation of RCA genes to improve photosynthetic rate and plant growth in soybean and other plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据