4.8 Article

Extracellular DNA Is Required for Root Tip Resistance to Fungal Infection

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 151, 期 2, 页码 820-829

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.142067

关键词

-

资金

  1. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona
  2. U.S. Department of Energy
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant defense involves a complex array of biochemical interactions, many of which occur in the extracellular environment. The apical 1- to 2-mm root tip housing apical and root cap meristems is resistant to infection by most pathogens, so growth and gravity sensing often proceed normally even when other sites on the root are invaded. The mechanism of this resistance is unknown but appears to involve a mucilaginous matrix or slime composed of proteins, polysaccharides, and detached living cells called border cells. Here, we report that extracellular DNA (exDNA) is a component of root cap slime and that exDNA degradation during inoculation by a fungal pathogen results in loss of root tip resistance to infection. Most root tips (>95%) escape infection even when immersed in inoculum from the root-rotting pathogen Nectria haematococca. By contrast, 100% of inoculated root tips treated with DNase I developed necrosis. Treatment with BAL31, an exonuclease that digests DNA more slowly than DNase I, also resulted in increased root tip infection, but the onset of infection was delayed. Control root tips or fungal spores treated with nuclease alone exhibited normal morphology and growth. Pea (Pisum sativum) root tips incubated with [P-32] dCTP during a 1-h period when no cell death occurs yielded root cap slime containing P-32-labeled exDNA. Our results suggest that exDNA is a previously unrecognized component of plant defense, an observation that is in accordance with the recent discovery that exDNA from white blood cells plays a key role in the vertebrate immune response against microbial pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据