4.8 Article

Post-Genomics Studies of Developmental Processes in Legume Seeds

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 151, 期 3, 页码 1023-1029

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.143966

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Legume seeds are an important source of food and feed, and have been principally studied with a view to optimizing the composition of reserve substances starch, oligosaccharides, oil, and protein. The availability of genome and transcribed genome sequences for the legume model species Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus has stimulated the application of the -omics technologies to understanding legume seed development in these and closely related crop species. The -omics techniques that we shall consider here are transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and ionomics (Fig. 1). Transcriptomics and proteomics methodologies attempt to describe the global complement of transcripts and proteins, respectively, of an organism, and utilize directly primary genomic sequence or expressed sequence tag information as reference. In contrast, metabolomics analyses determine organic metabolite constitution, and ionomics the inorganic ion contents of the organism. They are thus distinct but complementary sources of information about different levels of the phenome. The full exploitation of -omics depends on the establishment of interactive databases that facilitate connecting these different sources of information obtained without any a priori knowledge (Dondrup et al., 2009; Truncatulix: http://lily.cebitec.uni-bielefeld. de/truncatulix/app; Henckel et al., 2009; Legoo:http://www.legoo.org/). This backbone of technology is being applied to legume seeds in a number of ways: to dissect gene expression at different levels of detail (whole seed, component tissues, organelles, etc.), to study different physiological phenomena such as the different phases of seed development, maturation and germination, or biotic and abiotic stresses, and to evaluate the effects of specific mutations on phenotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据