4.8 Article

In Vivo Cell Wall Loosening by Hydroxyl Radicals during Cress Seed Germination and Elongation Growth

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 150, 期 4, 页码 1855-1865

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.139204

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFG LE720/6]
  2. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst [D/0628197, D/07/09926]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [D19626] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Loosening of cell walls is an important developmental process in key stages of the plant life cycle, including seed germination, elongation growth, and fruit ripening. Here, we report direct in vivo evidence for hydroxyl radical ((OH)-O-center dot)-mediated cell wall loosening during plant seed germination and seedling growth. We used electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to show that (OH)-O-center dot is generated in the cell wall during radicle elongation and weakening of the endosperm of cress (Lepidium sativum; Brassicaceae) seeds. Endosperm weakening precedes radicle emergence, as demonstrated by direct biomechanical measurements. By H-3 fingerprinting, we showed that wall polysaccharides are oxidized in vivo by the developmentally regulated action of apoplastic (OH)-O-center dot in radicles and endosperm caps: the production and action of (OH)-O-center dot increased during endosperm weakening and radicle elongation and were inhibited by the germination-inhibiting hormone abscisic acid. Both effects were reversed by gibberellin. Distinct and tissue-specific target sites of (OH)-O-center dot attack on polysaccharides were evident. In vivo (OH)-O-center dot attack on cell wall polysaccharides were evident not only in germinating seeds but also in elongating maize (Zea mays; Poaceae) seedling coleoptiles. We conclude that plant cell wall loosening by (OH)-O-center dot is a controlled action of this type of reactive oxygen species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据