4.5 Article

Optimization of virus-induced gene silencing in Catharanthus roseus

期刊

PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 63, 期 5, 页码 1159-1167

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ppa.12186

关键词

Catharanthus roseus; periwinkle; phytoplasma; Tobacco rattle virus; virus-induced gene silencing

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [101-2313-B-002-051-MY3, 102-2313-B-002-067-MY3]
  2. Academia Sinica, Taiwan
  3. National Taiwan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catharanthus roseus (periwinkle) contains abundant alkaloids and is the only commercial source of two cancer drugs, vinblastine and vincristine. The plant is also used as an experimental host for phytoplasmas because it can be infected by most phytoplasmas and shows distinctive symptoms. Abundant gene sequences for periwinkle have become available through high-throughput transcriptome sequencing, so periwinkle has become an ideal model for studies of alkaloid metabolism and plant-phytoplasma interactions. Tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) for functional genomics studies has been established, but the duration of the system was too short for plant-phytoplasma interaction studies. To improve the system, several factors were analysed, including culture temperature, plant age, leaf age, organ preferences and virus distribution, for their effects on VIGS efficacy. A new agroinfiltration method was also used for inoculating entire seedlings. High temperature (30 degrees C) strongly inhibited VIGS, but low temperature (16 degrees C) inhibited plant growth. VIGS efficacy was reduced in old leaves but was not affected by plant age. VIGS occurred in all examined organs, including roots, stems, leaves and flowers, but was most effective in leaves and flowers. The TRV-based system required the existence of TRV2 to maintain gene silencing, so TRV2 concentration may be used as an indicator of successful gene silencing. The optimized VIGS system was useful for studies of plant-phytoplasma interactions and conferred gene silencing for more than 6 months.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据