4.5 Article

Assessment of blast disease resistance in transgenic PRms rice using a gfp-expressing Magnaporthe oryzae strain

期刊

PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 677-689

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02061.x

关键词

confocal laser scanning microscopy; genetic transformation; green fluorescent protein; Oryza sativa; PRms gene; Pyricularia grisea

资金

  1. Generalitat de Catalunya
  2. Center CONSOLIDER on Agrigenomics (MEC)
  3. [BIO2006-05583]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rice blast caused by the fungus Magnaportbe oryzae (anamorph Pyricularia grisea) is one of the most devastating diseases Of Cultivated rice worldwide. In this study, a green fluorescent protein (gfp)-expressing M. oryzae strain was generated and used to investigate the infection process in a commercial rice cultivar. Expression of the gfp gene did not affect the pathogenicity of the M. oryzae transformants. Confocal microscopy allowed in vivo imaging of this pathogen during infection of rice tissues. Magnaportbe oryzae pathogenicity was examined on both leaf and root tissues. In roots of wild-type plants, the fungus penetrated into epidermal and cortical cells, and colonized the central cylinder and xylem vessels. However, the dimorphic growth pattern typically observed during the biotrophic and necrotrophic stages of leaf colonization was not observed during colonization of root tissues. Furthermore, events Occurring during infection of rice plants constitutively expressing the maize pathogenesis-related PRms gene were characterized and compared with those occurring during the interaction of this pathogen with untransformed rice plants. Fungal penetration was drastically reduced and delayed in tissues of PRms plants compared to untransformed plants. These results indicated that the gfp-expressing M. oryzae represents a strategic tool for the assessment of blast disease resistance in transgenic rice which can be also applied to the analysis of the M. oryzae interaction with other cultivars or mutants of important crop species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据