4.7 Article

CEBiP is the major chitin oligomer-binding protein in rice and plays a main role in the perception of chitin oligomers

期刊

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 84, 期 4-5, 页码 519-528

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11103-013-0149-6

关键词

CEBiP; Chitin receptor; Disease resistance; MAMPs; Oryza sativa L

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Council for Science and Technology Policy [GS028]
  3. Program for Promotion of Basic and Applied Researches for Innovations in Bio-oriented Industry in Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CEBiP, a plasma membrane-localized glycoprotein of rice, directly binds with chitin elicitors (CE), and has been identified as a receptor for CE by using CEBiP-RNAi rice cells. To further clarify the function of CEBiP, we produced CEBiP-disrupted rice plants by applying an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated gene-targeting system based on homologous recombination, which has recently been developed for rice. Homologous recombination occurred at the CEBiP locus in similar to 0.5 % of the positive/negative selected calli. In the self-pollinated next generation, it was confirmed that the first exon of CEBiP was replaced with the hygromycin selection cassette as designed, and that the expression of CEBiP was completely deficient in homozygous cebip lines. Affinity-labeling analysis using biotinylated N-acetylchitooctaose demonstrated that CEBiP is the major CE-binding protein in rice cultured cells and leaves, which was consistent with the result that the response to CE in cebip cells was greatly diminished. Nevertheless, we observed a significant decrease in disease resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae, the causal agent of rice blast disease, only when the cebip leaf sheaths were inoculated with a weakly virulent strain, suggesting that CE perception during the infection process of M. oryzae is limited. The response to peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharides in cebip cells was not affected, strongly suggesting that CEBiP is a CE-specific receptor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据