4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The effect of different 3' untranslated regions on the accumulation and stability of transcripts of a gfp transgene in chloroplasts of transplastomic tobacco

期刊

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 76, 期 3-5, 页码 385-396

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11103-010-9689-1

关键词

Chloroplast; GFP; RNA stability; Tobacco; Transplastomic plant; 3 ' Untranslated region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The 3' untranslated region (3' UTR) of transcripts is a major determinant of transcript stability in plastids and plays an important role in regulating gene expression. In order to compare the effect of different 3' UTRs on transgene expression in tobacco chloroplasts, the 3' UTRs from the tobacco chloroplast rbcL, psbA, petD and rpoA genes and the terminator region of the Escherichia coli rrnB operon were inserted downstream of the gfp reporter gene under the control of the psbA promoter, and the constructs were introduced into the plastid genome by particle bombardment. RNA-gel blot analysis of homoplasmic transplastomic plants identified gfp transcripts of similar to 1.0 and similar to 1.4 kb from all constructs and showed that plants expressing gfp with the rrnB terminator contained 4 times more gfp transcripts than plants expressing gfp with the rbcL and rpoA 3' UTRs. The amounts of transcripts accumulated roughly correlated with the half-life of the transcripts, determined by RNA-gel blot analysis of transcripts present in leaves treated with actinomycin D to prevent continued transcription of the chimeric gfp genes. Transcripts containing the 3' region of rrnB were most stable, with half-lives of similar to 43 h, considerably longer than the half-lives of the other similar to 1.0 kb gfp transcripts (13-26 h). Immunoblot analysis with antibodies to GFP indicated that all plants contained about the same amount of GFP (similar to 0.2% total soluble protein), suggesting either that translation was limited by something other than the amount of transcript or that the 3' UTR was affecting translation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据