4.8 Article

RACK1 scaffold proteins influence miRNA abundance in Arabidopsis

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 433-445

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12308

关键词

RACK1; miRNA; SERRATE; AGO1; Arabidopsis

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. Research Seed Capital Program
  4. University of Tubingen
  5. State of Baden-Wurttemberg
  6. Max Planck Society Chemical Genomics Centre (CGC) through AstraZeneca
  7. Max Planck Society Chemical Genomics Centre (CGC) through Bayer CropScience
  8. Max Planck Society Chemical Genomics Centre (CGC) through Bayer Healthcare
  9. Max Planck Society Chemical Genomics Centre (CGC) through Boehringer-Ingelheim
  10. Max Planck Society Chemical Genomics Centre (CGC) through Merck

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate plant development by post-transcriptional regulation of target genes. In Arabidopsis thaliana, DCL1 processes precursors (pri-miRNAs) to miRNA duplexes, which associate with AGO1. Additional proteins act in concert with DCL1 (e.g. HYL1 and SERRATE) or AGO1 to facilitate efficient and precise pri-miRNA processing and miRNA loading, respectively. In this study, we show that the accumulation of plant microRNAs depends on RECEPTOR FOR ACTIVATED C KINASE 1 (RACK1), a scaffold protein that is found in all higher eukaryotes. miRNA levels are reduced in rack1 mutants, and our data suggest that RACK1 affects the microRNA pathway via several distinct mechanisms involving direct interactions with known microRNA factors: RACK1 ensures the accumulation and processing of some pri-miRNAs, directly interacts with SERRATE and is part of an AGO1 complex. As a result, mutations in RACK1 lead to over-accumulation of miRNA target mRNAs, which are important for ABA responses and phyllotaxy, for example. In conclusion, our study identified complex functioning of RACK1 proteins in the Arabidopsis miRNA pathway; these proteins are important for miRNA production and therefore plant development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据