4.8 Article

Local and systemic regulation of sulfur homeostasis in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 72, 期 4, 页码 625-635

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05105.x

关键词

sulfur; O-acetylserine; split root; systemic signal; nutrient

资金

  1. French-German Research Network Program (P2R)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [HO1916/3-2]
  3. Max-Planck Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nutrients are limiting for plant growth and vigour. Hence, nutrient uptake and homeostasis must be adjusted to the needs of the plant according to developmental stages and environmental conditions. A split-root system was applied to analyse the systemic and local response of Arabidopsis thaliana to sulfur starvation. Arabidopsis thaliana plants in which only one root half was starved while the other root half was supplied with sulfate were analysed at the metabolic and transcriptional level. No systemic induction of sulfate uptake or expression of sulfate starvation marker genes was observed in split-roots sufficiently supplied with sulfate. Our data suggest that no activation of sulfur uptake takes part in sulfur-supplied root patches when the general sulfur status declines. When comparing roots of fully sulfate-starved plants with sulfate-starved split-root roots, expression of several potentially OAS responsive genes was attenuated in split-roots depending on the shoot sulfate status and the local root O-acetylserine concentration. In contrast, high-affinity sulfate transporters displayed similar expression in sulphate-starved split-roots and the corresponding controls. Feeding of 35SO42- to the shoot or to either part of a split-root system revealed that sulfate is the most prominent mobile sulfur-containing compound within the plant. Hence, we postulate a model whereby the soil sulfate availability regulates the sulfate uptake system of roots while the shoot sulfur status modulates the local O-acetylserine response in the root by passive plant sulfur status-dependent transport of sulfate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据