4.8 Review

Evolution, structure and function of mitochondrial carriers: a review with new insights

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 161-181

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04516.x

关键词

Arabidopsis; comparative genomics; evolution; mitochondrial carrier; mitochondrial transporter; plant genome

资金

  1. MIUR
  2. Center of Excellence in Genomics (CEGBA)
  3. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Puglia
  4. Italian Human ProteomeNet [RBRN07BMCT_009]
  5. Apulia Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>The mitochondrial carriers (MC) constitute a large family (MCF) of inner membrane transporters displaying different substrate specificities, patterns of gene expression and even non-mitochondrial organelle localization. In Arabidopsis thaliana 58 genes encode these six trans-membrane domain proteins. The number in other sequenced plant genomes varies from 37 to 125, thus being larger than that of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and comparable with that of Homo sapiens. In addition to displaying highly similar secondary structures, the proteins of the MCF can be subdivided into subfamilies on the basis of substrate specificity and the presence of specific symmetry-related amino acid triplets. We assessed the predictive power of these triplets by comparing predictions with experimentally determined data for Arabidopsis MCs, and applied these predictions to the not yet functionally characterized mitochondrial carriers of the grass, Brachypodium distachyon, and the alga, Ostreococcus lucimarinus. We additionally studied evolutionary aspects of the plant MCF by comparing sequence data of the Arabidopsis MCF with those of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Homo sapiens, then with those of Brachypodium distachyon and Ostreococcus lucimarinus, employing intra- and inter-genome comparisons. Finally, we discussed the importance of the approaches of global gene expression analysis and in vivo characterizations in order to address the relevance of these vital carrier proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据