4.6 Article

Differential plant growth and osmotic effects of two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars to exogenous glycinebetaine application under drought stress

期刊

PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 297-305

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10725-009-9379-7

关键词

Dry matter; Grain yield; Osmolyte; Glycinebetaine; Drought stress; Maize cultivars

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20070421133]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [30230230]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming [10501-181]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the effects of exogenous glycinebetaine (GB) and drought stress (DS) on grain yield (GY) and production of dry matter (DM) and osmolytes in two maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars i.e. Shaandan 9 (S-9) and Shaandan 911 (S-911) during the entire growing period. Drought stress substantially reduced DM and GY but increased free proline, endogenous GB, soluble sugar and K+ concentrations in leaves of both cultivars. The DM production, GY, drought index (DI) and concentrations of these osmolytes were greater for S-9 than those for S-911 under DS. The significant differences in these parameters suggested that S-9 was more drought-tolerant as compared to S-911. Additionally, foliar application of GB increased the concentrations of all osmolytes measured, DM and GY of both cultivars under DS. These positive responses of exogenous GB spray were more pronounced in S-911 as compared to those in S-9. Further correlation analysis involving a number of parameters indicated that maize production was tighterly correlated with accumulation of the osmolytes measured during DS rather than well-watered controls. Accordingly, this study demonstrated the notion of an anti-drought role of exogenous GB by osmoregulation under DS, particularly in this drought sensitive cultivar. Thus, exogenous GB application might be firstly used with drought sensitive species/cultivars when exposed to DS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据