4.6 Article

Cadmium-induced stress on the seed germination and seedling growth of Brassica napus L., and its alleviation through exogenous plant growth regulators

期刊

PLANT GROWTH REGULATION
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 47-59

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10725-008-9351-y

关键词

Cadmium stress; Plant growth regulator; Antioxidant enzyme; Brassica napus; Phytoremediation

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [30671339]
  2. Science and Technology Bureau of Zhejiang province [2006R10002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Because of its prolific growth, oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) can be grown advantageously for phytoremediation of the lands contaminated by industrial wastes. Therefore, toxic effect of cadmium on the germination of oilseed rape, the capability of plants for cadmium phytoextraction, and the effect of exogenous application of plant growth regulators to mitigate phytotoxicity of cadmium were investigated. For the lab study of seedlings at early stage, seeds were grown on filter papers soaked in different solutions of Cd2+ (0, 10, 50, 100, 200 and 400 mu M). In greenhouse study, seedlings were grown in soil for 8 weeks, transferred to hydroponic pots for another 6 weeks growth, and then treated with plant growth regulators and cadmium. Four plant growth regulators viz. jasmonic acid (12.5 mu M), abscisic acid (10 mu M), gibberellin (50 mu M) and salicylic acid (50 mu M); and three levels of Cd2+ (0, 50 and 100 mu M) were applied. Data indicated that lower concentration of Cd2+ (10 mu M) promoted the root growth, whereas the severe stresses (200 or 400 mu M) had negative effect on the establishment of germinating seedlings. Plants treated with any of the tested plant growth regulators alleviated cadmium toxicity symptoms, which were reflected by more fresh weight, less malondialdehyde concentration in leaves and lower antioxidant enzyme activities. The application of abscisic acid to the plants cultivated in the medium containing 100 mu M Cd2+ resulted in significantly lower plant internal cadmium accumulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据