4.1 Review

Altitudinal variation in leaf mass per unit area, leaf tissue density and foliar nitrogen and phosphorus content along an Amazon-Andes gradient in Peru

期刊

PLANT ECOLOGY & DIVERSITY
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 243-U7

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17550870903518045

关键词

-

资金

  1. School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh
  2. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  3. Amazon Conservation Association, Cusco
  4. Instituto Nacional de Recursos Naturales, Lima
  5. NERC [NE/F005806/1, NE/F002149/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/F002149/1, NE/F005806/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Leaf traits are important in determining the capacity for a plant to acquire carbon, but few data are available for montane cloud forests in the Andes. Aims: To investigate the changes in leaf traits along a large altitudinal transect (220-3600 m) from lowland to montane cloud forest in Peru. Methods: We determined leaf mass per area (LMA, g m(-2)), leaf tissue density (L-d, g cm(-3)), and foliar nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) content, both on a mass (N-m and P-m, %) and area (N-a and P-a, g m(-2)) basis for the most abundant species locally. Results: LMA increased with altitude (62.8-169.4 g m(-2)), though overall, LMA was lower than in comparable tropical elevation gradients. N-m declined significantly with altitude (2.39-1.25 %, P < 0.05), but N-m contents were higher than in comparable studies. The relatively high N-m and low LMA values are consistent with published global leaf trait datasets. No altitudinal trend for P-m was found; rather, our data highlighted the spatial variability in P-m (and P-a) within and among sites at different elevations. Foliar N:P ratios did not show a trend with altitude and did not indicate N limitation except at 3000 m altitude. Conclusions: Though leaf traits showed altitudinal trends similar to other studies, contrary to the general hypothesis, our data suggest that the tropical montane forests presented here are not N limited.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据