4.3 Article

Simulated nitrogen deposition enhances the performance of an exotic grass relative to native serpentine grassland competitors

期刊

PLANT ECOLOGY
卷 213, 期 6, 页码 1015-1026

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-012-0061-1

关键词

Nitrogen; Fertilization; Serpentine grassland; Invasion; Lolium multiflorum

资金

  1. University of California
  2. Kearney Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous research suggests that atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition may facilitate the invasion and persistence of exotic plant species in serpentine grasslands, but the relative impact of increased N availability on native and exotic competitive dynamics has yet to be clearly elucidated. In this study, we evaluated how increased N deposition affects plant performance and competitive dynamics of five native grasses and forbs (Plantago erecta, Layia gaillardioides, Lasthenia californica, Vulpia microstachys, and Cryptantha flaccida) and the most common invasive grass in Bay Area serpentine grasslands, Lolium multiflorum. Using a growth chamber system, we exposed Lolium in monoculture, and native species grown both in monoculture and in competition with the exotic Lolium, to all four possible combinations of gaseous nitrogen dioxide (NO2; a dominant atmospheric N pollutant) and soil ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3). In monocultures, gaseous NO2 and soil N addition each increased shoot biomass in Lolium and the natives Layia and Cryptantha. Lolium competitive ability (mean relative yield potential-RYP) increased in response to NO2 addition plus soil N addition against all native competitors. Lolium and most native species did not show differences in photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance in response to N addition. Our findings indicate that increasing N deposition and subsequent N accumulation in the soil may confer a competitive advantage to the exotic Lolium over native species by stimulating greater biomass accumulation and N allocation to photosynthetic tissue in the invader.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据