4.3 Article

Assessing the impact of land use and climate change on the evergreen broad-leaved species of Quercus acuta in Japan

期刊

PLANT ECOLOGY
卷 212, 期 2, 页码 229-243

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-010-9817-7

关键词

Bioindicator; Habitat fragmentation; Migration; Potential habitat; Random forest; Phytosociological releve data base

资金

  1. Global Environmental Research of Japan of the Ministry of the Environment [S-4, S-8]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the impact of Quercus acuta, a dominant species in the evergreen broad-leaved forests of Japan, and its habitat shifts as a result of climate change, we predicted the potential habitats under the current climate and two climate change scenarios using a random forest (RF). The presence/absence records of Q. acuta were extracted from the Phytosociological Releve Data Base as response variables, and four climatic variables (warmth index, WI; minimum temperature of the coldest month, TMC; summer precipitation, PRS; and winter precipitation, PRW) were used as predictor variables. The mean decrease in the Gini criterion revealed that WI was the most influential factor followed by TMC. The RF revealed a considerable increase in potential habitats (PHs) under the climate change scenarios for 2081-2100 (RCM20, 180,141 km(2); MIROC, 175,635 km(2)) relative to the current climate (150,542 km(2)). The land use variables were used for masking PH. The PH masked by land use (PHLU) was approximately half of the PH under the current conditions (74,567 km(2)). Under the climate change scenarios and 1 km migration options, the PHLU were not increased relative to its value under the current conditions. The distribution of Q. acuta was restricted by the northward shift in northern Honshu, but expanded as a result of the upward shift into the mountain areas of Western Japan. Habitat fragmentation reduced the ability of migration to respond to climate change in the lowland areas of Japan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据