4.7 Article

A Multiplex PCR Assay for Detection of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae and Differentiation of Populations with Different Geographic Origin

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 97, 期 4, 页码 472-478

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-06-12-0590-RE

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [IOS-0746501]
  2. [247]
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [746501] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Balestra, G. M., Taratufolo, M. C., Vinatzer, B. A., and Mazzaglia, A. 2013. A multiplex PCR assay for detection of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae and differentiation of populations with different geographic origin. Plant Dis. 97:472-478. Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae is responsible for severe outbreaks of bacterial canker of kiwifruit currently occurring around the world. Although molecular detection methods have been reported, none provide complete selectivity for this pathovar or discriminate among pathogen haplotypes. Therefore, a new multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was developed and validated. The assay was tested on 32 P syringae pv. actinidiae isolates and 15 non-P. syringae pv. actinidiae strains and correctly assigned P. syringae pv. actinidiae strains to three different haplotypes: a Japanese/Korean group, a European group, and a Chinese group. Two P. syringae pv. actinidiae isolates from New Zealand were found to belong to the Chinese group whereas two other isolates from New Zealand, which were isolated from kiwifruit plants but which do not cause bacterial canker, tested negative. The described PCR assays has a limit of detection of approximately 5 to 50 pg of purified DNA or of 5 x 10(2) bacteria/PCR and were shown to work with both artificially and naturally infected plant tissues. Thus, the described method represents a suitable tool for detection of P. syringae pv. actinidiae and haplotype attribution, in particular, when testing a high number of samples during surveillance and prevention activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据