4.7 Article

Phenotypic Characterization of Recent Clonal Lineages of Phytophthora infestans in the United States

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 97, 期 7, 页码 873-881

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-07-12-0682-RE

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cornell University
  2. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants Program from the USDA [2011-68004-30154]
  3. USDA NE-IPM Regional IPM program Special Grant [NYC-153560]
  4. NIFA [687380, 2011-68004-30154] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytophthora infestans, the causal agent of late blight disease, has been reported in the United States and Canada since the mid-nineteenth century. Due to the lack of or very limited sexual reproduction, the populations of P. infestans in the United States are primarily reproducing asexually and, thus, show a simple genetic structure. The emergence of new clonal lineages of P. infestans (US-22, US-23, and US-24) responsible for the late blight epidemics in the northeastern region of the United States in the summers of 2009 and 2010 stimulated an investigation into phenotypic traits associated with these genotypes. Mating type, differences in sensitivity to mefenoxam, differences in pathogenicity on potato and tomato, and differences in rate of germination were studied for clonal lineages US-8, US-22, US-23, and US-24. Both A1 and A2 mating types were detected. Lineages US-22, US-23, and US-24 were generally sensitive to mefenoxam while US-8 was resistant. US-8 and US-24 were primarily pathogenic on potato while US-22 and US-23 were pathogenic on both potato and tomato. Indirect germination was favored at lower temperatures (5 and 10 degrees C) whereas direct germination, though uncommon, was favored at higher temperatures (20 and 25 degrees C). Sporangia of US-24 released zoospores more rapidly than did sporangia of US-22 and US-23. The association of characteristic phenotypic traits with genotype enables the prediction of phenotypic traits from rapid genotypic analyses for improved disease management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据