4.7 Article

Population Dynamics Between Fusarium pseudograminearum and Bipolaris sorokiniana in Wheat Stems Using Real-Time qPCR

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 95, 期 9, 页码 1089-1098

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-11-10-0794

关键词

-

资金

  1. Montana Wheat and Barley Committee
  2. Montana Agricultural Experiment Station

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Moya-Elizondo, E. A., Jacobsen, B. J., Hogg, A. C., and Dyer, A. T. 2011. Population dynamics between Fusarium pseudograminearum and Bipolaris sorokiniana in wheat stems using real-time qPCR. Plant Dis. 95:1089-1098. Fusarium pseudograminearum and Bipolaris sorokiniana are causal agents of Fusarium crown rot and common root rot, respectively, of wheat and cause significant losses worldwide. Understanding the population dynamics between these two pathogens at late stages of wheat development is needed. The effect of E pseudograminearum and B. sorokiniana inocula applied singly or in mixtures at seeding to spring wheat 'Hank' was measured using seedling stand, grain yield, and pathogen populations in the first internode at heading, milk, and harvest stage of wheat development using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. High and low rates of E pseudograminearum inoculum reduced B. sorokiniana populations in field trials but B. sorokiniana inoculations did not affect F pseudograminearum populations. Populations of both pathogens increased front heading until harvest, with E psendograminearum colonizing lower internodes earlier than B. sorokiniana. Neither pathogen prevented infection by the other in the first internode of wheat stems. Inoculations increased incidence of infection and co-infection relative to natural settings observed for both pathogens. At the seedling stage, both fungi, individually or combined, reduced the seedling stands when compared with a non-inoculated control for the three location years. Grain yield and E pseudograminearum populations were inversely correlated, while B. sorokiniana populations were not correlated with yield.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据