4.5 Article

Cloning and characterisation of a pepper aquaporin, CaAQP, which reduces chilling stress in transgenic tobacco plants

期刊

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
卷 118, 期 3, 页码 431-444

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-014-0495-3

关键词

Abiotic stresses; CaAQP; Capsicum annuum L.; Tonoplast intrinsic protein; Transgenic tobacco

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31201615, 31272163]
  2. National Science and Technology in Rural Areas [2011BAD12B03]
  3. Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Coordinating Innovative Engineering Project [2012KTCL02-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ubiquitous cell membrane proteins called aquaporins are members of major intrinsic proteins (MIPs), which control the specific transport of water molecules across cell membranes. A pepper aquaporin gene (CaAQP), which exhibits the structural features of tonoplast intrinsic proteins of the MIP subfamily, was isolated from the leaves of chilling-treated seedlings of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cv. P70. Assays indicated high levels of expression in young seeds, green fruits and flower buds and low levels of expression in the stems, leaves and roots of pepper. The expression patterns were strongly and rapidly induced by HgCl2, low temperature, abscisic acid, fluridone and osmotic stresses. The responsiveness of pepper seedlings pretreated with abscisic acid at low temperatures demonstrated up-regulation of CaAQP by chilling, which is potentially involved in ABA signalling. Our results indicated that overexpression of CaAQP decreased chilling stress in transgenic plants, likely by increasing the stomatal aperture under stress, increasing the rate of membrane damage during the recovery stage, thereby affecting the intercellular CO2 concentration with lower stomatal conductance and transpiration rates. VIGS of CaAQP in pepper plants caused significant growth retardation. These results suggested that CaAQP played a crucial role in the plant response to abiotic stresses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据